The Polygraph Place

Thanks for stopping by our bulletin board.
Please take just a moment to register so you can post your own questions
and reply to topics. It is free and takes only a minute to register. Just click on the register link


  Polygraph Place Bulletin Board
  Professional Issues - Private Forum for Examiners ONLY
  Utah Probable Lie Comparison Test

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Utah Probable Lie Comparison Test
duras
Member
posted 02-11-2007 04:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for duras   Click Here to Email duras     Edit/Delete Message
Dear colleagues,
What is the correct and official name for the Utah technique?

-- Utah Modified Control Question Technique, UMCQT?
-- Utah Zone Comparison Technique, Utah ZCT?
-- Utah Zone Comparison Test, UZCT?
-- Utah Probable Lie Comparison Test, UPLCT, Utah PLT?

IP: Logged

Barry C
Member
posted 02-11-2007 07:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Barry C   Click Here to Email Barry C     Edit/Delete Message
You have the Utah ZCT and the Utah MGQT. The first is a single-issue test, the second, a multi-facet test. Either can use PLCQs or DLCQs, so you can add those to the name too, I suppose (e.g., Utah PLCQ ZCT).

IP: Logged

duras
Member
posted 02-11-2007 04:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for duras   Click Here to Email duras     Edit/Delete Message
I apologize for not making myself clear in my first post. My question was: what is the officially recognized name of Utah technique? What name should I use in my polygraph reports or in a courtroom? I utilize a three-question and four-question versions of Utah-Modified Control Question Technique, and currently I refer it as U-MCQT (as recommended by my School). As far as I understand your answer, a three-question version of U-MCQT is officially a «Utah ZCT», and a four-question version of U-MCQT is a «Utah MGQT». Is it right?

IP: Logged

Ted Todd
Member
posted 02-11-2007 06:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ted Todd     Edit/Delete Message
Duras,

Just refer to it as the

Deception
Utility
Recognition
Assesment
Series

Which is also known as the "DURAS" exam.

I personally prefer the following format

Tactical
Observation
Deception
Detection

This is also known as the "TODD" format.

(Sorry....I just had to do it! )

Ted

IP: Logged

Barry C
Member
posted 02-11-2007 08:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Barry C   Click Here to Email Barry C     Edit/Delete Message
Yes, sort of. If you are doing a single-issue test, it's the Utah ZCT. If you're doing a multi-facet test, then it's the Utah MGQT.

Now for the "extra" info you may have next to no interest in reading:

You can cut the fourth RQ out of the four RQ version, and you still have a Utah MGQT -- if it's a multi-facet test. Or, you could run a single-issue test with four RQs if you wanted. It would still be a Utah ZCT. With that said, stick to three questions for the single-issue ZCT as that's what most of the research was based on.

The Utah folks didn't create a hard-and-fast question sequence, structure, or technique. However, most of the research was based on a single-issue test with three CQs and three RQs, which were presented in that order and followed by a neutral. E.g, C1 R1 N1 C2 R2 N2 C3 R3 N3. That is why you see them refer to a "typical" test structure (see Raskin and Honts in Kleiner). (They use an introductory question and / or neutral question at the beginning along with a sacrifice relevant too, as I suspect you use in yours.)

I hope that helps.

IP: Logged

duras
Member
posted 02-12-2007 02:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for duras   Click Here to Email duras     Edit/Delete Message
Yes, that helps :-) Thank you!

IP: Logged

rnelson
Member
posted 02-12-2007 03:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rnelson   Click Here to Email rnelson     Edit/Delete Message
Todd,

I have a simplified handscoring interpretive technique...

which is why they never let me name anything.

Good thing my kid's mom named him.

r.

------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room."
--(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)


IP: Logged

Barry C
Member
posted 02-12-2007 04:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Barry C   Click Here to Email Barry C     Edit/Delete Message
You guys are killing me.

IP: Logged

Poly761
Member
posted 02-25-2007 07:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Poly761   Click Here to Email Poly761     Edit/Delete Message
Regarding UTAH scoring, I went back to a thread of Raymond's dated 9-20-06 and found his "cheat sheet" for UTAH scoring. It's indicated all RQ's must be answered NDI or DI, +/-6 after 3 charts.

I haven't used UTAH. Is it required that (all) RQ's be scored as NDI/DI? Is the seven-point system used?

Thanks for the sheet Ray; and also to those able to respond to this question.

END.....


IP: Logged

Barry C
Member
posted 02-25-2007 08:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Barry C   Click Here to Email Barry C     Edit/Delete Message
I'm not sure what you mean. Where in the cheat sheet are referring?

Anyhow, here's what I can answer:

In a single-issue test, the cut-offs are +/-6 regardless of spot scores. With a multi-issue test, if all scores are positive, then a +6 results in an NDI call for each spot, which means you could have three +2 scores in three spots and make an NDI call. The same is true for DI scores, if all the RQ spot totals are negative. Otherwise, use the traditional +/-3 spot score rule.

Do you have the 1999 special edition of POLYGRAPH on scoring (Bell et al)? That's where you'll find the Utah scoring system. The only change is they now require three breaths of suppression (or more) to score a reaction in the pneumo channels. (Bell et all says two.)

They use a 7-point system, and they describe just how scores are assigned in the article. The cheat sheet comes from that and the chapter on the Utah test in Murray Kleiner's book, where you'll find more info.

IP: Logged

rnelson
Member
posted 02-26-2007 04:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rnelson   Click Here to Email rnelson     Edit/Delete Message
Poly761,

That's Barry's cheat sheet, I tried to indicate that.

I'd hate to take credit for someone else's work.

It's a nice little quick reference.

Thanks Barry,

r

------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room."
--(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)


IP: Logged

Taylor
Member
posted 02-26-2007 09:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Taylor   Click Here to Email Taylor     Edit/Delete Message
There is also a modified Utah ZCT. I am trying to find where it is printed so I can refer you to it. Anyway, the Modified Utah Zone is the same as the 'unmodified' version with the exception of - on a multi issue any one spot score of -3 on any chart is DI.

It's good to see this board alive!

IP: Logged

Barry C
Member
posted 02-27-2007 06:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Barry C   Click Here to Email Barry C     Edit/Delete Message
It's not a modified Utah test. It's a Utah MGQT, and yes, a - 3 in any spot does it, BUT they call each RQ on its own. And, as I mentioned, a total of -6 - regardless of spot totals - results in a DI call.

They have a "typical" MGQT in Kleiner's book. Keep in mind, there is no hard and fast Utah ZCT format, but I've explained that elsewhere before.

IP: Logged

All times are PT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Polygraph Place

copyright 1999-2003. WordNet Solutions. All Rights Reserved

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.39c
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.